BAUG vs. XTAP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while XTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. BAUG is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAUG returned 11.25%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for XTAP. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

BAUG vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAUG achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 11.77% return.

BAUG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 6.48%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 1Y: 16.09%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: —

XTAP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 11.36%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 16.75%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAUG vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	7.62%	14.81%	21.15%	20.11%	-10.30%	8.23%
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF	11.77%	17.58%	14.26%	23.46%	-14.68%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BAUG and XTAP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.91

The correlation between BAUG and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAUG vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAUG	XTAP
Technology	38.4%	35.7%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.8%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.5%
Industrials	7.9%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.9%
Energy	3.2%	3.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BAUG vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAUG

BAUG Risk / Return Rank: 83
BAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XTAP

XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAUG vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAUG	XTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	3.90	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	6.49	-3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	2.00	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	10.80	-7.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	57.33	-42.93

BAUG vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAUG and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAUG vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAUG drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAUG and XTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAUG	XTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-22.13%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-1.72%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.78%	-11.83%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.59%	-22.13%	+6.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.27%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-3.39%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.32%	+0.80%

Volatility

BAUG vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.77%. This indicates that BAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAUG	XTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	1.77%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.04%	3.81%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.64%	4.77%	+2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.74%	14.55%	-2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.87%	14.29%	-0.42%

BAUG vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAUG and XTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

BAUG vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BAUG nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAUG and XTAP in my portfolio?

BAUG and XTAP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAUG or XTAP?

BAUG has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to XTAP (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAUG dropped -24.19% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

Which ETF is better, BAUG or XTAP?

On 5-year performance, BAUG leads with 11.25% vs 10.72% for XTAP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAUG or XTAP?

Over the 5-year period, BAUG has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAUG or XTAP?

BAUG and XTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAUG or XTAP?

BAUG and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BAUG and XTAP?

BAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while XTAP is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.