PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATVX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATVX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than FSMUX's 1.47% return.


BATVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

FSMUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.83%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
0.97%2.80%2.48%1.41%-0.10%0.00%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
1.47%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BATVX and FSMUX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.17

The correlation between BATVX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATVX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATVX

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATVXFSMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATVX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATVXFSMUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

2.60

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.38

0.11

+2.26

Drawdowns

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATVX drawdown since its inception was -0.20%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATVX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATVXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-16.27%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-2.68%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.10%

-5.95%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-5.45%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.21%

-1.21%

Volatility

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) is 0.20%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that BATVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATVXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

1.17%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.49%

2.09%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

3.13%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.64%

4.64%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.63%

4.64%

-4.01%

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATVX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BATVX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

BATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
2.55%2.76%2.44%1.40%0.00%0.00%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.99%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATVX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMUX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATVX dropped -0.20% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATVX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer