BATVX vs. DFCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX).
BATVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 20, 2021. DFCMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007.
Performance
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 0.33% | 2.80% | 2.48% | 1.41% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.44% | 2.55% | 2.84% | 2.53% | -0.76% | -0.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATVX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than DFCMX's 0.44% return.
BATVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFCMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATVX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCMX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BATVX vs. DFCMX — Risk / Return Rank
BATVX
DFCMX
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATVX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.56 | 3.45 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | 6.05 | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.84 | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.25 | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.72 | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATVX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56 | 3.45 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.29 | 1.28 | +1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATVX and DFCMX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Dividend Comparison
BATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than DFCMX's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 2.42% | 2.76% | 2.44% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.57% | 2.23% | 2.61% | 1.70% | 0.71% | 0.36% | 0.87% | 1.43% | 1.04% | 0.87% | 0.86% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATVX drawdown since its inception was -0.20%, smaller than the maximum DFCMX drawdown of -2.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATVX and DFCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATVX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -2.20% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -0.59% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.26% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.11% | -0.11% |
Volatility
BATVX vs. DFCMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) is 0.00%, while DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX) has a volatility of 0.20%. This indicates that BATVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATVX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.20% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | 0.41% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76% | 0.79% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 0.90% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 0.88% | -0.26% |