PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BATT.L is traded in USD, while NUKL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NUKL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT.L achieves a 35.17% return, which is significantly higher than NUKL.DE's 10.39% return.


BATT.L

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
35.17%
6M
40.03%
1Y
128.07%
3Y*
28.19%
5Y*
16.19%
10Y*

NUKL.DE

1D
0.99%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
10.39%
6M
3.91%
1Y
53.41%
3Y*
45.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BATT.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
35.17%71.43%-1.20%-5.68%
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
10.39%71.04%30.14%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BATT.L and NUKL.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023

0.57

The correlation between BATT.L and NUKL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT.L
BATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKL.DE
NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATT.LNUKL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.22

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.95

1.90

+7.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.19

4.65

+25.54

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATT.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.24, which is higher than the NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT.L and NUKL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATT.LNUKL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24

1.25

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.18

-0.47

Drawdowns

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT.L drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than NUKL.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT.L and NUKL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATT.LNUKL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.70%

-34.33%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-27.96%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.90%

-34.33%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-13.36%

+7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-7.21%

-4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

11.46%

-7.23%

Volatility

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) have volatilities of 11.35% and 11.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATT.LNUKL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

11.43%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.92%

29.57%

-5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.01%

42.40%

-12.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.51%

34.73%

-9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

34.73%

-9.58%

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BATT.L vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATT.L nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BATT.L and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BATT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BATT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

BATT.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while NUKL.DE is Energy Equities. BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATT.L and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATT.L and NUKL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer