BATT.L vs. IISU.L
BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) and IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while IISU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BATT.L returned 16.19%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for IISU.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IISU.L.
Performance
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BATT.L is traded in USD, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT.L achieves a 35.17% return, which is significantly higher than IISU.L's 12.36% return.
BATT.L
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 35.17%
- 6M
- 40.03%
- 1Y
- 128.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.19%
- 10Y*
- —
IISU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- —
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 35.17% | 71.43% | -1.20% | 8.80% | -14.18% | 15.68% | 81.32% | 16.59% | -24.50% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.36% | 19.63% | 17.30% | 17.33% | -5.28% | 21.09% | 9.50% | 29.46% | -18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT.L and IISU.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BATT.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BATT.L
IISU.L
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Basic Materials
BATT.L
IISU.L
Industrials
BATT.L
IISU.L
Consumer Cyclical
BATT.L
IISU.L
Technology
BATT.L
IISU.L
Utilities
BATT.L
IISU.L
Communication Services
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Energy
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Financial Services
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Healthcare
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Real Estate
BATT.L
-
IISU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BATT.L
IISU.L
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATT.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.28 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.95 | 2.12 | +6.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.19 | 8.33 | +21.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATT.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24 | 1.64 | +2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.71 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT.L drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT.L and IISU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -41.81% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.23% | -10.84% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.90% | -19.93% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | -21.88% | -12.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -1.21% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -5.12% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 2.77% | +1.46% |
Volatility
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that BATT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.35% | 4.63% | +6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.92% | 11.28% | +12.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.01% | 14.03% | +15.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.51% | 17.06% | +8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 19.59% | +5.56% |
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BATT.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.
BATT.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IISU.L is Industrials Equities. BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATT.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.
Find the right allocation for BATT.L and IISU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer