BATG.L vs. V3AB.L
BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) and V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while V3AB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BATG.L returned 17.96%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for V3AB.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AB.L.
Performance
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BATG.L is traded in GBp, while V3AB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3AB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATG.L achieves a 37.63% return, which is significantly higher than V3AB.L's 12.10% return.
BATG.L
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 37.63%
- 6M
- 44.30%
- 1Y
- 135.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- —
V3AB.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 30.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 37.63% | 60.42% | 0.47% | 2.83% | -3.91% | 12.67% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 12.10% | 12.22% | 19.77% | 17.95% | -11.67% | 17.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATG.L and V3AB.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BATG.L and V3AB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Basic Materials
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Consumer Cyclical
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Technology
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Utilities
BATG.L
V3AB.L
Communication Services
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Consumer Defensive
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Energy
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Financial Services
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Healthcare
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Real Estate
BATG.L
-
V3AB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L — Risk / Return Rank
BATG.L
V3AB.L
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.50 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.91 | 3.81 | +6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.05 | 15.62 | +18.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.86 | 2.61 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.91 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than V3AB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATG.L and V3AB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -19.00% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -8.00% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.37% | -19.00% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.37% | -19.00% | -14.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -0.58% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -4.22% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 1.96% | +2.01% |
Volatility
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) at 3.38%. This indicates that BATG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3AB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 3.38% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.92% | 8.82% | +13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 11.69% | +16.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 13.72% | +8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 13.68% | +9.16% |
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than V3AB.L's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATG.L vs. V3AB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BATG.L nor V3AB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATG.L and V3AB.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3AB.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3AB.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.
BATG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while V3AB.L is Global Equities. BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General Investment Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATG.L and 0.24% for V3AB.L.
Find the right allocation for BATG.L and V3AB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer