BATG.L vs. LITU.L

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) and LITU.L (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Lithium & Battery Metals funds - BATG.L tracks the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index while LITU.L tracks the Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BATG.L returned 21.89%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for LITU.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LITU.L.

Performance

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BATG.L is traded in GBp, while LITU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LITU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATG.L achieves a 24.75% return, which is significantly higher than LITU.L's 22.73% return.

BATG.L

• 1D: -4.77%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: 24.75%
• 6M: 23.88%
• 1Y: 113.74%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: —

LITU.L

• 1D: -4.34%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: 22.73%
• 6M: 21.38%
• 1Y: 119.22%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	24.75%	60.42%	0.47%	2.83%	-3.91%	0.18%
LITU.L Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc	22.73%	47.90%	-18.58%	-15.20%	-21.60%	-5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.L and LITU.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021	0.74

The correlation between BATG.L and LITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BATG.L	LITU.L
Industrials	32.1%	20.4%
Basic Materials	24.0%	48.1%
Consumer Cyclical	19.4%	9.0%
Technology	17.5%	22.3%
Utilities	7.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BATG.L vs. LITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATG.L

BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LITU.L

LITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
LITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BATG.L	LITU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.85	3.79	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	4.11	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.55	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.43	8.00	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.09	26.87	-1.78

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is comparable to the LITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATG.L and LITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.11%, smaller than the maximum LITU.L drawdown of -61.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATG.L and LITU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATG.L	LITU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.11%	-61.84%	+13.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	-14.82%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.36%	-51.14%	+16.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.94%	-11.53%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.02%	-32.62%	+15.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	4.42%	+0.10%

Volatility

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L) at 10.18%. This indicates that BATG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATG.L	LITU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	10.18%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.91%	22.09%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.36%	31.32%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.54%	29.20%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.19%	29.20%	-2.01%

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LITU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATG.L vs. LITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATG.L nor LITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATG.L and LITU.L in my portfolio?

BATG.L and LITU.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BATG.L or LITU.L?

On fees, BATG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BATG.L or LITU.L?

BATG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LITU.L.

What is the main difference between BATG.L and LITU.L?

BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while LITU.L tracks Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General Investment Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATG.L and 0.60% for LITU.L.