PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATE.DE vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BATE.DE is traded in EUR, while EMXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMXC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATE.DE achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 45.33% return.


BATE.DE

1D
-2.30%
1M
-10.92%
YTD
20.81%
6M
21.86%
1Y
101.45%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*

EMXC

1D
1.60%
1M
4.59%
YTD
45.33%
6M
47.20%
1Y
71.00%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BATE.DE
Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
20.81%54.92%4.47%5.32%-9.11%25.96%63.27%21.00%-14.01%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
45.33%19.10%9.46%15.39%-14.58%16.65%3.46%18.41%-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BATE.DE and EMXC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2018

0.53

The correlation between BATE.DE and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATE.DE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATE.DE
BATE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BATE.DEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.56

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.67

6.04

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.65

21.87

+0.78

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATE.DE and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATE.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -37.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATE.DE and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATE.DEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-37.86%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.12%

-11.81%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.05%

-18.28%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.05%

-18.28%

-15.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.66%

-4.09%

-9.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-6.58%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.26%

+1.20%

Volatility

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) is 10.20%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that BATE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATE.DEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.20%

13.47%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.43%

21.69%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.65%

23.67%

+6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

16.79%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

19.42%

+4.15%

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BATE.DE and EMXC have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

BATE.DE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

BATE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATE.DE
Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.89%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATE.DE and EMXC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BATE.DE and EMXC have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

BATE.DE is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. BATE.DE tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATE.DE and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer