PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATE.DE achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly higher than 8PSB.DE's -20.12% return.


BATE.DE

1D
-2.30%
1M
-10.92%
YTD
20.81%
6M
21.86%
1Y
101.45%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*

8PSB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.61%
YTD
-20.12%
6M
-12.91%
1Y
67.59%
3Y*
31.35%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BATE.DE
Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
20.81%54.92%4.47%5.32%-9.11%25.96%63.27%21.00%-14.01%
8PSB.DE
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
-20.12%130.25%18.21%-0.84%4.98%-13.65%47.00%16.08%-9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2018

0.21

Over the past year, BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATE.DE
BATE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

8PSB.DE
8PSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BATE.DE8PSB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.25

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.67

1.48

+5.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.65

3.30

+19.35

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the 8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATE.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown of -76.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATE.DE8PSB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-76.19%

+39.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.12%

-45.60%

+30.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.05%

-45.60%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.05%

-45.60%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.66%

-45.60%

+31.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-53.66%

+45.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

20.48%

-16.02%

Volatility

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Legal & General Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATE.DE) is 10.20%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) has a volatility of 14.13%. This indicates that BATE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 8PSB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATE.DE8PSB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.20%

14.13%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.43%

52.99%

-28.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.65%

59.75%

-29.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

35.94%

-12.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

32.10%

-8.53%

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATE.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than 8PSB.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BATE.DE vs. 8PSB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BATE.DE nor 8PSB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATE.DE.

BATE.DE is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while 8PSB.DE is Silver. BATE.DE tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BATE.DE and 0.19% for 8PSB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATE.DE and 8PSB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer