BATAX vs. PYSGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BATAX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio) and PYSGX (Payden Strategic Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BATAX returned 3.59%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for PYSGX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATAX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PYSGX.

Performance

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATAX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than PYSGX's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BATAX has outperformed PYSGX with an annualized return of 3.59%, while PYSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return.

BATAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

PYSGX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 5.88%
• 5Y*: 2.67%
• 10Y*: 3.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio	1.87%	7.37%	7.34%	6.43%	-5.87%	1.72%	2.75%	6.76%	2.20%	5.21%
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	0.62%	6.85%	5.46%	7.42%	-6.61%	1.72%	6.20%	8.33%	-0.52%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BATAX and PYSGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.58

The correlation between BATAX and PYSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BATAX vs. PYSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATAX

BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 96
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PYSGX

PYSGX Risk / Return Rank: 73
PYSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PYSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PYSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PYSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PYSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) and Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATAX	PYSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	2.60	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.71	3.96	+3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.14	1.53	+0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.69	2.94	+3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.98	11.57	+16.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the PYSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATAX and PYSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATAX	PYSGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	2.60	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.56	0.93	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	1.23	-0.12

Drawdowns

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATAX drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, which is greater than PYSGX's maximum drawdown of -12.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATAX and PYSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATAX	PYSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-12.70%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.94%	-1.95%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.15%	-2.22%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.12%	-9.97%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.42%	-12.70%	-4.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.52%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.40%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	0.49%	-0.27%

Volatility

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) is 0.67%, while Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) has a volatility of 0.80%. This indicates that BATAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATAX	PYSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.80%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	1.70%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	2.21%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.18%	2.89%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.07%	2.85%	+0.22%

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PYSGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATAX vs. PYSGX - Dividend Comparison

BATAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than PYSGX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio	5.74%	5.92%	5.45%	3.91%	3.14%	1.82%	3.22%	4.73%	5.36%	4.10%	0.40%	0.00%
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	4.76%	5.15%	5.22%	4.42%	3.76%	3.38%	2.90%	3.25%	3.27%	2.75%	2.70%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATAX and PYSGX in my portfolio?

BATAX and PYSGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATAX or PYSGX?

PYSGX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to BATAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATAX dropped -17.42% vs PYSGX's -12.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.