PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BASMX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BASMX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASMX achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BASMX having a 14.79% annualized return and QCELX not far ahead at 15.20%.


BASMX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.66%
YTD
11.60%
6M
11.46%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
14.79%

QCELX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.79%
YTD
18.09%
6M
19.95%
1Y
38.37%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASMX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BASMX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares
11.60%16.81%23.46%25.63%-19.32%25.26%20.37%30.71%-5.57%20.65%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.09%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BASMX and QCELX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between BASMX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BASMX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASMX
BASMX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASMX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BASMXQCELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

3.11

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

4.21

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.55

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.00

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.07

23.00

-7.93

BASMX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASMX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BASMXQCELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.11

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.86

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.72

+0.09

Drawdowns

BASMX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASMX drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QCELX drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASMX and QCELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BASMXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-33.52%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.92%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-18.38%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-28.70%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-33.52%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-5.66%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.72%

+0.22%

Volatility

BASMX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) have volatilities of 2.94% and 3.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BASMXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.06%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.34%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.75%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

18.93%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

18.97%

-0.56%

BASMX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASMX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

BASMX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

BASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than QCELX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BASMX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares
0.78%0.86%0.99%1.19%1.33%1.33%1.20%1.90%2.18%1.93%1.37%0.00%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BASMX and QCELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to BASMX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASMX dropped -34.95% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BASMX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer