BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) and QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BANK.TO is passively managed, while QDAY.NEO is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BANK.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QDAY.NEO.

Performance

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BANK.TO achieves a 17.36% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 31.76% return.

BANK.TO

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 17.36%
• 6M: 23.52%
• 1Y: 55.24%
• 3Y*: 31.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 18.94%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 28.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund	17.36%	27.87%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	31.76%	14.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BANK.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BANK.TO

BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BANK.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.78	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BANK.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	2.63	-1.56

Drawdowns

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BANK.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANK.TO and QDAY.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BANK.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.03%	-19.44%	-9.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	0.00%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-5.23%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BANK.TO	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	22.72%	-10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.65%	22.72%	-7.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	22.72%	-7.07%

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BANK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BANK.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BANK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.02%, less than QDAY.NEO's 13.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund	13.02%	13.73%	15.28%	13.60%	10.52%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	13.90%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BANK.TO and QDAY.NEO in my portfolio?

BANK.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BANK.TO or QDAY.NEO?

On fees, BANK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BANK.TO or QDAY.NEO?

BANK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

What is the main difference between BANK.TO and QDAY.NEO?

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BANK.TO and 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.