BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO
BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) and HBIL.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) are both Derivative Income funds. BANK.TO is passively managed, while HBIL.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, BANK.TO returned 55.24% vs 2.87% for HBIL.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BANK.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HBIL.TO.
Performance
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BANK.TO achieves a 17.36% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL.TO's 0.59% return.
BANK.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 55.24%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 17.36% | 41.00% | 9.00% |
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 0.59% | 3.05% | -1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BANK.TO and HBIL.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BANK.TO
HBIL.TO
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BANK.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.59 | 1.74 | +2.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.28 | 2.71 | +3.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.34 | +0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.75 | 3.03 | +3.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.78 | 9.74 | +20.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BANK.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59 | 1.74 | +2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.64 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BANK.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANK.TO and HBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BANK.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -1.69% | -27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.23% | -0.95% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.31% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -0.48% | -8.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 0.30% | +1.56% |
Volatility
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that BANK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BANK.TO | HBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 0.62% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 1.24% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 1.66% | +10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 2.03% | +13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 2.03% | +13.62% |
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BANK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BANK.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
BANK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.02%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANK.TO Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 13.02% | 13.73% | 15.28% | 13.60% | 10.52% |
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 6.52% | 7.49% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BANK.TO and HBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BANK.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BANK.TO and 0.35% for HBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for BANK.TO and HBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer