BAMV vs. PRXV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BAMV (Brookstone Value Stock ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

BAMV vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAMV

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.79%
• 6M: 11.36%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.23%

PRXV

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	$485.78K	$484.91K	$458.78K
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	$979.94K	$510.04K	$263.55K

BAMV vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	7.26%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMV and PRXV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026	0.73

Return for Risk

BAMV vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMV

BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 71
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PRXV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMV vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMV	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMV vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMV	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-1.41%	-13.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.24%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-0.39%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMV	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	10.08%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	10.08%	+3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.59%	10.08%	+3.51%

BAMV vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMV vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than PRXV's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	1.22%	1.32%	3.66%	0.19%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMV and PRXV in my portfolio?

BAMV and PRXV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMV or PRXV?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMV or PRXV?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMV or PRXV?

BAMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.38% for PRXV.

What is the main difference between BAMV and PRXV?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMV and 0.36% for PRXV.