PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMV vs. FEGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMV vs. FEGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMV achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than FEGE's 5.24% return.


BAMV

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.04%
6M
9.77%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEGE

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.76%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMV vs. FEGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
10.04%7.66%0.73%
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
5.24%34.19%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMV and FEGE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.68

The correlation between BAMV and FEGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMV vs. FEGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BAMV
FEGE

Financial Services

28.3%
11.6%

Technology

26.0%
16.1%

Industrials

10.4%
9.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
11.6%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.4%

Energy

5.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

4.9%
9.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
14.8%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Financial Services

BAMV
28.3%
FEGE
11.6%

Technology

BAMV
26.0%
FEGE
16.1%

Industrials

BAMV
10.4%
FEGE
9.8%

Healthcare

BAMV
9.8%
FEGE
11.6%

Communication Services

BAMV
8.7%
FEGE
8.4%

Energy

BAMV
5.9%
FEGE
8.2%

Basic Materials

BAMV
4.9%
FEGE
9.0%

Real Estate

BAMV
2.8%
FEGE
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BAMV
2.1%
FEGE
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

BAMV
0.8%
FEGE
14.8%

Utilities

BAMV
0.3%
FEGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMV vs. FEGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMV
BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FEGE
FEGE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEGE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FEGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEGE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMV vs. FEGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAMVFEGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.16

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

7.24

+0.21

BAMV vs. FEGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FEGE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMV and FEGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAMV vs. FEGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than FEGE's maximum drawdown of -11.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and FEGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMVFEGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-11.13%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-10.96%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-5.89%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-1.79%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.26%

-1.20%

Volatility

BAMV vs. FEGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is 3.75%, while First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that BAMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMVFEGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.95%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

10.57%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

12.70%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

14.69%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

14.69%

-0.97%

BAMV vs. FEGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEGE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAMV vs. FEGE - Dividend Comparison

BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than FEGE's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
1.27%1.32%3.66%0.19%
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
1.22%1.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMV and FEGE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEGE has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to BAMV (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMV dropped -14.56% vs FEGE's -11.13%.

On 1-year performance, FEGE leads with 23.54% vs 15.31% for BAMV. On fees, FEGE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BAMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEGE has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEGE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.

BAMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.22% for FEGE.

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and First Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMV and 0.50% for FEGE.

FEGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMV and FEGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer