PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMBX vs. BGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BAMBX has underperformed BGSAX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while BGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


BAMBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.12%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
4.30%

BGSAX

1D
4.46%
1M
9.11%
YTD
43.57%
6M
43.11%
1Y
67.10%
3Y*
38.82%
5Y*
16.37%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund
0.00%4.59%6.61%6.19%-3.23%5.84%3.34%8.25%1.51%9.72%
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
43.57%19.63%40.56%49.09%-43.13%8.19%86.27%43.84%2.03%49.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMBX and BGSAX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.08

The correlation between BAMBX and BGSAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMBX vs. BGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMBX
BAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BGSAX
BGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAMBXBGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.40

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.57

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

10.42

-9.39

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the BGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMBX and BGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum BGSAX drawdown of -73.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMBX and BGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMBXBGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-73.75%

+64.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-18.49%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.19%

-27.75%

+22.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.66%

-49.22%

+42.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.84%

-49.22%

+40.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-0.29%

-3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-26.33%

+25.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

6.32%

-4.22%

Volatility

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) is 1.32%, while BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) has a volatility of 14.41%. This indicates that BAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMBXBGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

14.41%

-13.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.44%

23.82%

-20.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

27.87%

-23.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

28.32%

-24.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.61%

26.19%

-22.58%

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAMBX and BGSAX have an expense ratio of 1.20%.


Dividends

BAMBX vs. BGSAX - Dividend Comparison

BAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than BGSAX's 9.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BAMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund
1.97%1.97%3.86%4.13%4.70%2.39%1.09%3.73%8.70%3.81%4.82%
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
9.44%13.55%8.68%0.00%0.00%7.66%4.86%1.50%1.24%8.01%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMBX and BGSAX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSAX has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to BAMBX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMBX dropped -8.84% vs BGSAX's -73.75%.

BGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMBX and BGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer