BAMB vs. VGVT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) and VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMB charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VGVT.

Performance

BAMB vs. VGVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than VGVT's 0.25% return.

BAMB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.90%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGVT

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMB vs. VGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.73%	2.63%
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	0.25%	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMB and VGVT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

BAMB vs. VGVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 20
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMB vs. VGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMB	VGVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMB	VGVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.23	-0.18

Drawdowns

BAMB vs. VGVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMB drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, which is greater than VGVT's maximum drawdown of -2.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMB and VGVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMB	VGVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-2.77%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	-1.61%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-0.66%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMB	VGVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	3.23%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.07%	3.23%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.07%	3.23%	+0.84%

BAMB vs. VGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMB has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMB vs. VGVT - Dividend Comparison

BAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than VGVT's 3.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	3.98%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMB and VGVT in my portfolio?

BAMB and VGVT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMB or VGVT?

On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMB or VGVT?

VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMB or VGVT?

VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.95% for BAMB.

What is the main difference between BAMB and VGVT?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for BAMB and 0.10% for VGVT.