BAMB vs. PCRB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) and PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAMB charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PCRB.

Performance

BAMB vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAMB

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.83%
• YTD: -0.83%
• 1Y: 2.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCRB

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMB vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.83%	6.15%	3.01%	2.94%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	-0.48%	7.21%	1.91%	6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMB and PCRB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.87

The correlation between BAMB and PCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAMB vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 19
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PCRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMB vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMB	PCRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMB	PCRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMB	PCRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.06%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.06%	—	—

BAMB vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMB has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMB vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

BAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	9.42%	4.30%	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMB and PCRB in my portfolio?

BAMB and PCRB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMB or PCRB?

On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMB or PCRB?

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMB or PCRB?

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 2.95% for BAMB.

What is the main difference between BAMB and PCRB?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for BAMB and 0.35% for PCRB.