BAMB vs. FFUT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMB returned 0.01% vs 23.75% for FFUT. Their -0.37 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BAMB charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

BAMB vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMB achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 13.58% return.

BAMB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: -1.34%
• YTD: -1.49%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.70%

FFUT

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 5.46%
• 6M: 9.55%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 23.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	$195.06K	$194.31K	$201.91K
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	$7.77M	$4.00M	$2.01M

BAMB vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-1.49%	3.06%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	13.58%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMB and FFUT is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

BAMB vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 16
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 88
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMB vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMB	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	2.02	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	2.85	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.38	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	4.20	-3.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	14.36	-13.64

BAMB vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMB and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMB vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMB drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMB and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMB	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-5.59%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	-5.59%	+2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	-1.43%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-1.11%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	1.63%	-0.10%

Volatility

BAMB vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) is 0.91%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that BAMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMB	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	3.61%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	9.27%	-6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	11.67%	-7.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.05%	11.09%	-7.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.05%	11.09%	-7.04%

BAMB vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMB has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMB vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

BAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than FFUT's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.97%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.84%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMB and FFUT in my portfolio?

BAMB and FFUT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMB or FFUT?

FFUT has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to BAMB (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMB dropped -4.48% vs FFUT's -5.59%.

Which ETF is better, BAMB or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 23.75% vs 0.01% for BAMB. On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BAMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMB or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMB or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMB or FFUT?

BAMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.84% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between BAMB and FFUT?

BAMB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for BAMB and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.