BAMB vs. DDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAMB charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.

Performance

BAMB vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.25% return.

BAMB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.90%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DDV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 2.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMB vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.73%	0.20%
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	2.25%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMB and DDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

BAMB vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 20
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMB vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMB	DDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMB	DDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	2.09	-1.04

Drawdowns

BAMB vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMB drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMB and DDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMB	DDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-1.92%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.38%	-0.09%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-0.35%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMB	DDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	2.69%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.07%	2.69%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.07%	2.69%	+1.38%

BAMB vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMB has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMB vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

BAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	1.21%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMB and DDV in my portfolio?

BAMB and DDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMB or DDV?

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMB or DDV?

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMB or DDV?

BAMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

What is the main difference between BAMB and DDV?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for BAMB and 0.25% for DDV.