PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALQ vs. XQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALQ vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BALQ

1D
-0.21%
1M
11.15%
YTD
22.89%
6M
22.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XQQI

1D
-0.59%
1M
9.52%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALQ vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BALQ and XQQI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALQ vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BALQ vs. XQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALQXQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.81

2.97

-0.16

Drawdowns

BALQ vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALQ drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum XQQI drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALQ and XQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALQXQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-12.53%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.59%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-2.05%

-0.32%

Volatility

BALQ vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALQXQQIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

22.32%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

22.32%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

22.32%

-4.29%

BALQ vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALQ vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

BALQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than XQQI's 7.88% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BALQ and XQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BALQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BALQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 7.88%, compared with 4.59% for BALQ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BALQ and 0.98% for XQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALQ and XQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer