BAIAX vs. BIAGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAIAX (Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund) and BIAGX (Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - BAIAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds, while BIAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 10 years, BAIAX returned 1.32%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BIAGX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BAIAX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BIAGX.

Performance

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund (BAIAX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAIAX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than BIAGX's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BAIAX has underperformed BIAGX with an annualized return of 1.32%, while BIAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.

BAIAX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 3.42%
• 3Y*: 3.63%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 1.32%

BIAGX

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 3.06%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 3.31%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAIAX Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund	-0.02%	6.73%	1.78%	4.04%	-9.66%	-1.57%	5.28%	6.54%	0.17%	2.19%
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	6.22%	0.61%	16.60%	33.90%	-33.60%	18.56%	32.41%	47.97%	4.66%	30.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BAIAX and BIAGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1999	-0.12

The correlation between BAIAX and BIAGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BAIAX vs. BIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAIAX

BAIAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
BAIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BAIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BAIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BAIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BIAGX

BIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund (BAIAX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAIAX	BIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	0.27	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	0.47	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.06	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.20	+1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	0.49	+4.22

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the BIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAIAX and BIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIAX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum BIAGX drawdown of -56.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIAX and BIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAIAX	BIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-56.68%	+42.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.28%	-20.56%	+18.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.59%	-56.68%	+52.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.87%	-56.68%	+42.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.87%	-56.68%	+42.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-44.38%	+42.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-15.04%	+11.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	8.43%	-7.63%

Volatility

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund (BAIAX) is 0.98%, while Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that BAIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAIAX	BIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	6.32%	-5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.29%	12.45%	-10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99%	15.55%	-12.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.47%	47.31%	-42.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	36.39%	-32.65%

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAIAX vs. BIAGX - Dividend Comparison

BAIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than BIAGX's 81.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAIAX Brown Advisory Intermediate Income Fund	3.61%	3.63%	3.38%	2.75%	1.73%	1.79%	1.48%	2.34%	2.32%	1.88%	1.74%	2.30%
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	81.44%	86.50%	91.52%	6.80%	7.75%	13.04%	4.95%	9.82%	12.64%	8.09%	9.13%	6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAIAX and BIAGX in my portfolio?

BAIAX and BIAGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAIAX or BIAGX?

BIAGX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to BAIAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAIAX dropped -13.87% vs BIAGX's -56.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.