BAGY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAGY returned -37.04% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

BAGY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGY achieves a -21.90% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.

BAGY

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -20.28%
• YTD: -21.90%
• 6M: -24.70%
• 1Y: -37.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	-21.90%	-8.88%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGY and LQTI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

BAGY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGY

BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAGY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	1.12	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	1.64	-2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.19	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.68	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	5.15	-6.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAGY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAGY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	1.12	-2.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	0.88	-1.54

Drawdowns

BAGY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGY drawdown since its inception was -47.52%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAGY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.52%	-3.41%	-44.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.52%	-3.41%	-44.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.06%	-1.44%	-43.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-0.88%	-18.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.28%	1.11%	+25.17%

Volatility

BAGY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that BAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAGY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	1.65%	+8.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.39%	4.02%	+29.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.93%	5.10%	+36.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.86%	5.97%	+34.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	5.97%	+34.89%

BAGY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAGY and LQTI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

BAGY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.25%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	58.25%	30.16%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAGY and LQTI in my portfolio?

BAGY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAGY or LQTI?

BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGY dropped -47.52% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, BAGY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 5.69% vs -37.04% for BAGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAGY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 5.69% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAGY or LQTI?

BAGY and LQTI have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAGY or LQTI?

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between BAGY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.