BAGY vs. CSHP
BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAGY returned -37.04% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BAGY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
BAGY vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAGY achieves a -21.90% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.
BAGY
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -20.28%
- YTD
- -21.90%
- 6M
- -24.70%
- 1Y
- -37.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAGY vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | -21.90% | -8.88% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAGY and CSHP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | -0.09 |
BAGY vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BAGY
CSHP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BAGY
CSHP
Basic Materials
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Communication Services
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Consumer Defensive
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Energy
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Healthcare
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Industrials
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Real Estate
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Technology
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Utilities
BAGY
-
CSHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAGY vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
BAGY
CSHP
BAGY vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAGY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -32.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 7.44 | -6.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 65.71 | -66.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 432.16 | -433.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAGY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 11.91 | -12.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 10.75 | -11.41 |
Drawdowns
BAGY vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAGY drawdown since its inception was -47.52%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGY and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAGY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.52% | -0.08% | -47.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.52% | -0.06% | -47.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.06% | 0.00% | -45.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -0.00% | -19.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.28% | 0.01% | +26.27% |
Volatility
BAGY vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAGY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 0.07% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.39% | 0.24% | +33.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.93% | 0.33% | +41.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 0.40% | +40.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 0.40% | +40.46% |
BAGY vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAGY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAGY vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.25%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | 58.25% | 30.16% | 0.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAGY and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGY dropped -47.52% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BAGY.
BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.
BAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BAGY and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAGY and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer