PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFMX vs. BIAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BAFMX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIAHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
0.84%
6M
3.22%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BAFMX
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund
-2.65%3.70%15.29%23.21%-28.12%6.32%32.56%38.63%-8.59%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
0.84%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFMX and BIAHX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018

0.63

The correlation between BAFMX and BIAHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFMX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFMX

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAFMXBIAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFMXBIAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

Volatility

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFMXBIAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFMX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

BAFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.00%, more than BIAHX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BAFMX
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund
75.00%73.01%0.00%0.00%6.85%9.92%0.00%0.52%1.14%0.00%0.00%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.54%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFMX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFMX and BIAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer