BABU vs. TSMG
BABU (Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BABU is passively managed, while TSMG is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
BABU vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BABU
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -37.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- -13.49%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 80.39%
- 6M
- 88.25%
- 1Y
- 241.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABU vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | -64.16% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 30.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABU and TSMG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABU vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
BABU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMG
BABU vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABU vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABU drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABU and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.16% | -63.67% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.16% | -13.49% | -50.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.68% | -16.65% | -21.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility
BABU vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABU | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 60.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.53% | 76.78% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 83.21% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 83.21% | -4.68% |
BABU vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABU vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than TSMG's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 6.37% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABU and TSMG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BABU.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.12% for BABU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BABU and 0.75% for TSMG.
Find the right allocation for BABU and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer