PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABO vs. QYLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABO vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABO vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


BABO

1D
2.67%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
-12.67%
6M
-23.73%
1Y
-6.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BABO vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BABO vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO
BABO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABO vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABOQYLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.52

BABO vs. QYLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABOQYLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Dividends

BABO vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.67%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

BABO vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.26%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and QYLE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABOQYLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.26%

0.00%

-29.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.64%

0.00%

-26.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

0.00%

-12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

Volatility

BABO vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABOQYLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.51%

0.00%

+37.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.96%

0.00%

+36.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.96%

0.00%

+36.96%