BABO vs. QYLE
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE).
BABO and QYLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BABO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Aug 7, 2024. QYLE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023.
Performance
BABO vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BABO vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | -19.07% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
BABO
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -12.67%
- 6M
- -23.73%
- 1Y
- -6.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BABO vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BABO vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank
BABO
QYLE
BABO vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BABO | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABO | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | — | — |
Dividends
BABO vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison
BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.67%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | 87.67% | 85.50% | 20.65% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BABO vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.26%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and QYLE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABO | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.26% | 0.00% | -29.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.64% | 0.00% | -26.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | 0.00% | -12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.93% | — | — |
Volatility
BABO vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BABO | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.51% | 0.00% | +37.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 0.00% | +36.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 0.00% | +36.96% |