PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA vs. LDOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than LDOS's -32.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has underperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 6.28%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.


BA

1D
-1.16%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
0.89%
6M
7.18%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*
6.28%

LDOS

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-32.12%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
-16.67%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA
The Boeing Company
0.89%22.67%-32.10%36.84%-5.38%-5.95%-33.90%3.34%11.50%94.72%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-32.12%26.50%34.52%4.50%20.04%-14.20%8.95%88.82%-16.72%29.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BA and LDOS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.35

The correlation between BA and LDOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA:

$179.22B

LDOS:

$15.64B

EPS

BA:

$2.90

LDOS:

$10.92

PE Ratio

BA:

75.49

LDOS:

11.19

PEG Ratio

BA:

11.83

LDOS:

0.09

PS Ratio

BA:

1.86

LDOS:

0.92

PB Ratio

BA:

29.97

LDOS:

3.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA:

$92.18B

LDOS:

$17.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA:

$4.43B

LDOS:

$3.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA:

$7.13B

LDOS:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA
BA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BALDOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.91

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.43

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

-1.09

+1.78

BA vs. LDOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and LDOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BA vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, which is greater than LDOS's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and LDOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALDOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.45%

-54.72%

-34.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-38.73%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-38.73%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.76%

-38.73%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-42.29%

-35.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.09%

-38.49%

-10.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-19.68%

-11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

15.33%

-4.38%

Volatility

BA vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) at 6.30%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALDOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

6.30%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.39%

25.00%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.33%

29.28%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.58%

26.73%

+9.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.61%

27.48%

+14.13%

Dividends

BA vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

BA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.36%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%

Financials

BA vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.22B
4.40B
(BA) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BA vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boeing Company and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
11.5%
17.3%
Portfolio components
BA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 22.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

BA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

BA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -4.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA and LDOS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BA has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to LDOS (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BA dropped -89.45% vs LDOS's -54.72%.

BA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA and LDOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer