PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 6.28%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.28% annualized return.


BA

1D
-1.16%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
0.89%
6M
7.18%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*
6.28%

HWM

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
29.23%
6M
33.60%
1Y
54.95%
3Y*
79.69%
5Y*
50.00%
10Y*
33.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA
The Boeing Company
0.89%22.67%-32.10%36.84%-5.38%-5.95%-33.90%3.34%11.50%94.72%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
29.23%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BA and HWM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1962

0.35

The correlation between BA and HWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA:

$179.22B

HWM:

$106.66B

EPS

BA:

$2.90

HWM:

$4.31

PE Ratio

BA:

75.49

HWM:

61.42

PEG Ratio

BA:

11.83

HWM:

1.04

PS Ratio

BA:

1.86

HWM:

12.42

PB Ratio

BA:

29.97

HWM:

19.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA:

$92.18B

HWM:

$8.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA:

$4.43B

HWM:

$2.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA:

$7.13B

HWM:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA
BA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

3.46

-3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

9.77

-9.08

BA vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BA vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, roughly equal to the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.45%

-88.30%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-15.89%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-19.41%

-28.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.76%

-21.61%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-64.81%

-13.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.09%

-3.26%

-45.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-31.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

5.61%

+5.34%

Volatility

BA vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 11.03%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

11.03%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.39%

25.03%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.33%

31.46%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.58%

32.20%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.61%

39.82%

+1.79%

Dividends

BA vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

BA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

BA vs. HWM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.22B
2.31B
(BA) Total Revenue
(HWM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BA vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boeing Company and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
11.5%
36.9%
Portfolio components
BA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 22.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

BA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

BA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -4.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA and HWM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BA has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BA dropped -89.45% vs HWM's -88.30%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer