PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA vs. BA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BA is traded in USD, while BA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than BA.L's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has underperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 6.28%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


BA

1D
-1.16%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
0.89%
6M
7.18%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*
6.28%

BA.L

1D
-1.78%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.86%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
31.41%
5Y*
30.99%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA
The Boeing Company
0.89%22.67%-32.10%36.84%-5.38%-5.95%-33.90%3.34%11.50%94.72%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
12.20%63.60%4.12%40.34%43.72%16.51%-6.51%33.58%-21.46%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BA and BA.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007

0.27

The correlation between BA and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA:

$179.22B

BA.L:

£57.97B

EPS

BA:

$2.90

BA.L:

£1.33

PE Ratio

BA:

75.49

BA.L:

14.41

PEG Ratio

BA:

11.83

BA.L:

2.30

PS Ratio

BA:

1.86

BA.L:

1.06

PB Ratio

BA:

29.97

BA.L:

4.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA:

$92.18B

BA.L:

£54.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA:

$4.43B

BA.L:

£4.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA:

$7.13B

BA.L:

£7.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA
BA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.03

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.07

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

0.16

+0.53

BA vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and BA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BA vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and BA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.45%

-57.18%

-32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-22.64%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-22.64%

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.76%

-22.64%

-31.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-41.57%

-36.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.09%

-16.88%

-32.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-18.53%

-12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

10.00%

+0.95%

Volatility

BA vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to BAE Systems plc (BA.L) at 9.11%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

9.11%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.39%

24.23%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.33%

30.85%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.58%

27.07%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.61%

26.84%

+14.77%

Dividends

BA vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

BA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
1.90%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%

Financials

BA vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.22B
14.77B
(BA) Total Revenue
(BA.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BA values in USD, BA.L values in GBP

BA vs. BA.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boeing Company and BAE Systems plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-15.0%-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20222023202420252026
11.5%
9.2%
Portfolio components
BA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 22.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

BA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

BA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

BA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

BA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -4.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.

BA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA and BA.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA and BA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer