PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZN.L vs. ANXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in AstraZeneca plc (AZN.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZN.L achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than ANXG.L's 19.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AZN.L has underperformed ANXG.L with an annualized return of 16.08%, while ANXG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.61% annualized return.


AZN.L

1D
2.60%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
0.75%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
16.08%

ANXG.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
8.17%
YTD
19.88%
6M
17.66%
1Y
41.02%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
22.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZN.L
AstraZeneca plc
-0.69%34.59%0.92%-3.53%32.32%21.78%-0.99%33.98%19.31%21.08%
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
19.88%11.70%28.70%48.00%-25.42%29.85%43.37%34.20%4.47%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AZN.L and ANXG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.26

The correlation between AZN.L and ANXG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZN.L
AZN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AZN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AZN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXG.L
ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca plc (AZN.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZN.LANXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.75

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

10.95

-6.10

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZN.L and ANXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZN.LANXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.85

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.99

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.17

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.18

-0.65

Drawdowns

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZN.L drawdown since its inception was -49.99%, which is greater than ANXG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN.L and ANXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZN.LANXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.99%

-27.69%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-11.12%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.75%

-24.54%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.75%

-27.69%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

-27.69%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.79%

-0.64%

-12.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-5.35%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

3.81%

+1.96%

Volatility

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison

AstraZeneca plc (AZN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 4.14%. This indicates that AZN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZN.LANXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.14%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

10.39%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.50%

14.62%

+9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

19.12%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

19.31%

+5.01%

Dividends

AZN.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison

AZN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AZN.L
AstraZeneca plc
1.74%1.77%2.23%2.21%1.98%2.33%2.95%2.87%3.44%4.28%4.50%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZN.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZN.L and ANXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer