PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AYEW.DE achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.


AYEW.DE

1D
-1.67%
1M
15.12%
YTD
24.61%
6M
23.38%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
21.48%
10Y*

EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AYEW.DE
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
24.61%9.65%33.73%55.77%-29.69%41.89%30.99%12.00%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-13.59%32.71%5.48%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.86

The correlation between AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AYEW.DE
AYEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AYEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AYEW.DEEUNL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.64

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

14.52

-6.52

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AYEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AYEW.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.90

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.82

+0.20

Drawdowns

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AYEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AYEW.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-33.63%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-6.50%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.01%

-21.73%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.10%

-21.73%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-0.31%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-4.25%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

1.64%

+4.00%

Volatility

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that AYEW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AYEW.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

2.62%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

7.72%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.98%

11.16%

+8.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

14.17%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

15.17%

+8.31%

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AYEW.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AYEW.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison

AYEW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AYEW.DE
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.46%0.82%0.40%0.65%0.12%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AYEW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AYEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

AYEW.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. AYEW.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AYEW.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AYEW.DE and EUNL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer