PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF USD Acc (AYEP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AYEP.DE achieves a -5.35% return, which is significantly lower than ESAD.DE's 7.67% return.


AYEP.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-4.80%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
-1.21%
10Y*

ESAD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
7.67%
6M
6.84%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AYEP.DE
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF USD Acc
-5.35%15.89%-4.24%-5.46%-4.63%
ESAD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation
7.67%-3.81%3.54%7.64%-19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.57

The correlation between AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AYEP.DE
AYEP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AYEP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAD.DE
ESAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF USD Acc (AYEP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AYEP.DEESAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.12

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.90

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

2.70

-1.60

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AYEP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AYEP.DEESAD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.63

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.12

+0.13

Drawdowns

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AYEP.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than ESAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AYEP.DEESAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-30.37%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-8.26%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-17.22%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.71%

-11.52%

-5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-17.56%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.75%

+1.32%

Volatility

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF USD Acc (AYEP.DE) is 2.79%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that AYEP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AYEP.DEESAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.98%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

9.07%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

11.74%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.71%

14.78%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

14.78%

+0.65%

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AYEP.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

AYEP.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AYEP.DE nor ESAD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAD.DE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AYEP.DE.

AYEP.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Asia Dividend+, while ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AYEP.DE and 0.41% for ESAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AYEP.DE and ESAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer