AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE).
AXQT.DE and ANAU.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AXQT.DE is a passively managed fund by AXA IM that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. It was launched on Feb 5, 2025. ANAU.DE is a passively managed fund by AXA IM that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2022. Both AXQT.DE and ANAU.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Different Trading Currencies
AXQT.DE is traded in EUR, while ANAU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANAU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXQT.DE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than ANAU.DE's -4.16% return.
AXQT.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 46.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.31% | 15.03% |
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | -4.16% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AXQT.DE and ANAU.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AXQT.DE has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AXQT.DE
ANAU.DE
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AXQT.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 0.77 | +1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 1.17 | +2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.16 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 2.33 | +1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | 6.98 | +7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AXQT.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 0.77 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.91 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.65%, smaller than the maximum ANAU.DE drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXQT.DE and ANAU.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXQT.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.65% | -22.35% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -10.88% | -0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -7.86% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -3.08% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.98% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison
AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) at 5.52%. This indicates that AXQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AXQT.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 5.52% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 12.34% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 20.65% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 19.15% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 19.15% | -0.53% |
Dividends
AXQT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AXQT.DE nor ANAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.