AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE).
AXQE.DE and JREM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AXQE.DE is a passively managed fund by AXA IM that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Feb 5, 2025. JREM.DE is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG). It was launched on Dec 6, 2018. Both AXQE.DE and JREM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AXQE.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating | 9.19% | 28.56% |
JREM.DE JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 8.08% | 14.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXQE.DE achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than JREM.DE's 8.08% return.
AXQE.DE
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 42.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JREM.DE
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AXQE.DE and JREM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Return for Risk
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AXQE.DE
JREM.DE
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AXQE.DE | JREM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.45 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 1.96 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.61 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 9.27 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AXQE.DE | JREM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.45 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.43 | +1.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between AXQE.DE and JREM.DE is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AXQE.DE nor JREM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXQE.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.82%, smaller than the maximum JREM.DE drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXQE.DE and JREM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXQE.DE | JREM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -30.28% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.82% | -13.91% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -6.84% | -5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -10.90% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 3.04% | +1.50% |
Volatility
AXQE.DE vs. JREM.DE - Volatility Comparison
AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) at 7.90%. This indicates that AXQE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JREM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AXQE.DE | JREM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 7.90% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 13.60% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 18.83% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 16.46% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 18.80% | +2.03% |