AWTAX vs. PGJZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX).
AWTAX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Mar 30, 2008. PGJZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 24, 2013.
Performance
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | -1.16% | 11.87% | 5.25% | 11.99% | -21.01% | 25.39% | 16.68% | 32.78% | -12.50% | 21.99% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.87% | 18.41% | 17.13% | 5.85% | -7.82% | 15.06% | 1.98% | 28.89% | -8.57% | 18.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWTAX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than PGJZX's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AWTAX has underperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 7.91%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
AWTAX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 8.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
PGJZX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWTAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWTAX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank
AWTAX
PGJZX
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWTAX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.92 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 2.47 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.38 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.11 | -2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 12.57 | -9.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWTAX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.92 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.78 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.61 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWTAX and PGJZX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison
AWTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than PGJZX's 6.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWTAX Virtus Water Fund | 12.07% | 11.93% | 7.78% | 3.30% | 0.42% | 7.72% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 3.71% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 0.38% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.60% | 7.18% | 9.95% | 1.59% | 3.30% | 7.77% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWTAX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, which is greater than PGJZX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWTAX and PGJZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWTAX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.12% | -36.64% | -17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.74% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -20.56% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.78% | -36.64% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -4.13% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -5.66% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.91% | +1.37% |
Volatility
AWTAX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) at 4.65%. This indicates that AWTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWTAX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 4.65% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 7.49% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 12.49% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 14.22% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 15.73% | +1.54% |