PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWTAX vs. EIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWTAX achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than EIPIX's 17.00% return.


AWTAX

1D
0.83%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-5.55%
1Y
-1.30%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
7.17%

EIPIX

1D
1.39%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
17.00%
6M
15.02%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWTAX
Virtus Water Fund
-3.74%11.87%5.25%11.99%-21.01%25.39%16.68%32.78%-12.50%21.99%
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
17.00%11.31%26.74%6.25%16.19%21.80%-9.85%23.09%-11.68%-0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AWTAX and EIPIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between AWTAX and EIPIX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWTAX vs. EIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWTAX
AWTAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
AWTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
AWTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EIPIX
EIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWTAXEIPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.41

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

5.37

-5.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

17.92

-18.09

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWTAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the EIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWTAX and EIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWTAXEIPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

2.42

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

1.02

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.52

-0.21

Drawdowns

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWTAX drawdown since its inception was -54.12%, which is greater than EIPIX's maximum drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWTAX and EIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWTAXEIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.12%

-43.98%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-4.51%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.00%

-13.00%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-16.71%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

-3.19%

-7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-5.02%

-4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

1.35%

+3.21%

Volatility

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Water Fund (AWTAX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) at 3.67%. This indicates that AWTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWTAXEIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.67%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

7.86%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

10.05%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

15.65%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

18.73%

-1.40%

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWTAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWTAX vs. EIPIX - Dividend Comparison

AWTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, less than EIPIX's 13.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWTAX
Virtus Water Fund
12.39%11.93%7.78%3.30%0.42%7.72%1.61%2.98%3.71%2.43%0.99%0.38%
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
13.43%15.71%7.60%4.09%25.10%3.44%4.02%3.44%3.45%1.77%0.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWTAX and EIPIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWTAX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to EIPIX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWTAX dropped -54.12% vs EIPIX's -43.98%.

EIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWTAX and EIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer