AWPAX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AWPAX (AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AWPAX returned 1.12%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for GSIMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AWPAX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWPAX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 6.45% return.

AWPAX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 8.55%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: 6.54%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 12.69%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund	7.33%	13.57%	-0.32%	13.09%	-26.80%	9.20%	29.55%	26.88%	-17.50%	34.55%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.45%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AWPAX and GSIMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between AWPAX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AWPAX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWPAX

AWPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8
AWPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWPAX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.27	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	1.78	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.23	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	1.56	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	5.22	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWPAX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWPAX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	1.27	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.63	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.82	-0.48

Drawdowns

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWPAX drawdown since its inception was -63.00%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWPAX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWPAX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.00%	-28.84%	-34.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-7.81%	-5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.47%	-10.32%	-9.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.13%	-25.37%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-3.70%	+1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.78%	-4.82%	-13.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	2.33%	+1.27%

Volatility

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that AWPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWPAX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.75%	2.77%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	7.89%	+6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	9.66%	+6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.36%	14.36%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	15.69%	+1.14%

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWPAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWPAX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.52%	7.00%	1.67%	1.11%	14.44%	0.00%	0.77%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.81%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWPAX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

AWPAX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWPAX or GSIMX?

AWPAX has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWPAX dropped -63.00% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.