AWP vs. FIKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX).
AWP is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007. FIKMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
AWP vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWP vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 1.13% | 12.43% | 12.23% | 12.58% | -37.13% | 40.41% | -10.29% | 42.52% | -9.35% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 0.41% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWP achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 0.41% return.
AWP
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWP vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWP has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWP vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank
AWP
FIKMX
AWP vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWP | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.32 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 1.17 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 4.90 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWP | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.99 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.61 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.52 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWP and FIKMX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AWP vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison
AWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, more than FIKMX's 4.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 12.74% | 12.50% | 12.44% | 12.37% | 12.31% | 7.02% | 9.13% | 8.49% | 12.05% | 8.90% | 11.70% | 10.40% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.78% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AWP vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWP drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWP and FIKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWP | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.93% | -34.49% | -51.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | -4.35% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -18.04% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.68% | -2.72% | -6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.59% | -5.26% | -22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.04% | +2.50% |
Volatility
AWP vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that AWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWP | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 1.67% | +5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 2.90% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 4.96% | +13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 6.52% | +15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 10.69% | +12.90% |