AWK vs. IGM
AWK (American Water Works Company, Inc.) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, AWK returned 6.97%/yr vs 24.07%/yr for IGM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AWK vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWK achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.51% return. Over the past 10 years, AWK has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 6.97%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.07% annualized return.
AWK
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- -5.13%
- 3Y*
- -1.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
IGM
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 19.94%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 1Y
- 40.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 24.07%
AWK vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 2.20% | 7.40% | -3.53% | -11.68% | -17.89% | 24.83% | 26.88% | 37.79% | 1.32% | 29.01% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.51% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWK and IGM is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2008 | 0.23 |
The correlation between AWK and IGM shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWK vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
AWK
IGM
AWK vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.50 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 7.94 | -8.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWK vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWK drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWK and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -65.59% | +28.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -16.44% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.24% | -26.39% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -40.68% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.10% | -40.68% | +3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.21% | -7.49% | -15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -15.19% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 5.16% | +3.58% |
Volatility
AWK vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) is 7.52%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that AWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWK | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 9.89% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 19.55% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 23.45% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 26.21% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 24.75% | -0.97% |
Dividends
AWK vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
AWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 2.57% | 2.49% | 2.41% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.96% | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.23% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWK and IGM have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to AWK (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWK dropped -37.10% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWK and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer