AWAY vs. UBER
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Prime Travel Technology Index, while UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -5.64%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for UBER. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
AWAY vs. UBER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -16.56% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.29%
UBER
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- 6M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -16.56%
- 1Y
- -23.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $667.86K | $330.70K | $217.64K | |
| $1.51B | $1.25B | $1.45B |
AWAY vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.03% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -16.56% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 23.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and UBER is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between AWAY and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
UBER
AWAY vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWAY | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.90 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.70 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | -1.15 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum UBER drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and UBER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -68.05% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -34.13% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -34.13% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.10% | -57.69% | +8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.50% | -31.89% | -9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -25.72% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.45% | 20.70% | -2.25% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) is 8.19%, while Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that AWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 10.41% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 26.20% | -7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 34.64% | -11.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 45.12% | -18.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 50.48% | -18.84% |
Dividends
AWAY vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison
Neither AWAY nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and UBER have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBER has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to AWAY (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs UBER's -68.05%.
AWAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and UBER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer