PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1T.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than ASWA.DE's -10.58% return.


AW1T.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
0.50%
YTD
7.24%
6M
10.78%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
10Y*

ASWA.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AW1T.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
7.24%37.16%9.32%3.67%
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
-10.58%26.07%-11.37%-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1T.DE
AW1T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AW1T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWA.DE
ASWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AW1T.DEASWA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.01

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

0.03

+8.16

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1T.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AW1T.DEASWA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.01

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

-0.04

+1.54

Drawdowns

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum ASWA.DE drawdown of -30.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1T.DEASWA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-30.36%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-30.36%

+21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-23.85%

+22.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-8.15%

+6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

10.54%

-7.91%

Volatility

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE) is 3.45%, while HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that AW1T.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1T.DEASWA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

7.52%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

37.06%

-26.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

33.68%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

24.72%

-10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.79%

24.72%

-10.93%

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1T.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AW1T.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1T.DE nor ASWA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW1T.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1T.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

AW1T.DE tracks MSCI EMU Value, while ASWA.DE tracks SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AW1T.DE and 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1T.DE and ASWA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer