AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE
AW1P.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1P.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while VVMX.DE is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AW1P.DE returned 18.31%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for VVMX.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AW1P.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for VVMX.DE.
Performance
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1P.DE achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than VVMX.DE's 21.99% return.
AW1P.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 21.99%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 124.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1P.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 17.34% | 3.61% | 25.39% | 22.76% | -14.89% |
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 21.99% | 68.45% | -30.81% | -21.17% | -22.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1P.DE and VVMX.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1P.DE
VVMX.DE
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AW1P.DE | VVMX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 6.07 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 14.48 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1P.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.64%, smaller than the maximum VVMX.DE drawdown of -73.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1P.DE and VVMX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1P.DE | VVMX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -73.26% | +49.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -20.68% | +12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.64% | -61.20% | +37.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -30.23% | +29.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -41.03% | +35.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 8.66% | -6.46% |
Volatility
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE) is 4.33%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a volatility of 12.77%. This indicates that AW1P.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVMX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1P.DE | VVMX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 12.77% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 33.60% | -22.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 47.34% | -33.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 36.44% | -20.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 36.44% | -20.68% |
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1P.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VVMX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AW1P.DE vs. VVMX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1P.DE nor VVMX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1P.DE and VVMX.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1P.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1P.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
AW1P.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while VVMX.DE is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. AW1P.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AW1P.DE and 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1P.DE and VVMX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer