AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
AW1H.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - AW1H.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AW1H.DE returned 15.67%/yr vs 29.89%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AW1H.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1H.DE achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return.
AW1H.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AW1H.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc | 7.82% | 23.67% | 10.99% | 18.33% | -14.28% | 2.74% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1H.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AW1H.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1H.DE
IBCJ.DE
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1H.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 3.90 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 9.60 | -3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1H.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.65 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.15 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1H.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1H.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -56.11% | +29.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -9.96% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -18.47% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.16% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -19.38% | +13.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 4.05% | -1.07% |
Volatility
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) is 4.49%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that AW1H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1H.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 7.13% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 17.61% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 23.48% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 26.72% | -9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 25.15% | -8.39% |
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1H.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
AW1H.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1H.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1H.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1H.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AW1H.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1H.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer