AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AW1H.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc) and H4ZZ.DE (HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - AW1H.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while H4ZZ.DE tracks the EURO STOXX 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AW1H.DE returned 15.67%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for H4ZZ.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AW1H.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZZ.DE.

Performance

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1H.DE achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZZ.DE's 7.20% return.

AW1H.DE

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 15.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

H4ZZ.DE

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 15.62%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AW1H.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc	7.82%	23.67%	10.99%	18.33%	6.67%
H4ZZ.DE HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	7.20%	22.35%	10.99%	22.53%	9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022	0.98

The correlation between AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1H.DE

AW1H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 34
AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AW1H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AW1H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 34
AW1H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AW1H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 38

H4ZZ.DE

H4ZZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 29
H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
H4ZZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
H4ZZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
H4ZZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
H4ZZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AW1H.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.98	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.54	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	1.43	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	4.86	+1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AW1H.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	0.98	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.18	-0.62

Drawdowns

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AW1H.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.23%	-16.46%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-10.94%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-16.46%	+0.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.53%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-2.68%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.23%	-0.25%

Volatility

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) is 4.49%, while HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that AW1H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AW1H.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.93%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	12.97%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	15.97%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	15.85%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	15.85%	+0.91%

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1H.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AW1H.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1H.DE nor H4ZZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, AW1H.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AW1H.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for AW1H.DE.

What is the main difference between AW1H.DE and H4ZZ.DE?

AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AW1H.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.