PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1H.DE achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than ELFC.DE's 12.62% return.


AW1H.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
2.09%
YTD
7.82%
6M
9.94%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*

ELFC.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
12.62%
6M
11.95%
1Y
20.69%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AW1H.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
7.82%23.67%10.99%18.33%-14.28%2.74%
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
12.62%17.73%-0.16%15.69%1.54%2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021

0.75

The correlation between AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1H.DE
AW1H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ELFC.DE
ELFC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) and Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AW1H.DEELFC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.00

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

8.42

-2.56

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AW1H.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AW1H.DEELFC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.81

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.55

0.00

Drawdowns

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, smaller than the maximum ELFC.DE drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AW1H.DEELFC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.23%

-37.68%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.71%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-15.02%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.60%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-4.70%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.39%

+0.59%

Volatility

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1H.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that AW1H.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELFC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AW1H.DEELFC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.62%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

8.07%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

11.12%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

13.76%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

16.40%

+0.36%

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1H.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ELFC.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AW1H.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Dividend Comparison

AW1H.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELFC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AW1H.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
4.08%4.45%4.66%4.66%4.91%3.85%2.83%3.64%4.20%3.53%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW1H.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

AW1H.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Universal Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while ELFC.DE tracks EURO iSTOXX® ex Financials High Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AW1H.DE and 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AW1H.DE and ELFC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer