AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L
AVWS.DE (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - AVWS.DE is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. AVWS.DE is actively managed, while SGLN.L is passively managed. Over the past year, AVWS.DE returned 39.51% vs 23.07% for SGLN.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVWS.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AVWS.DE is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVWS.DE achieves a 21.62% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -0.78% return.
AVWS.DE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVWS.DE Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR | 21.62% | 7.86% | 5.81% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.78% | 45.64% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVWS.DE and SGLN.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVWS.DE
SGLN.L
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVWS.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.20 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 1.09 | +5.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.97 | 3.30 | +20.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -47.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVWS.DE and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVWS.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.20% | -47.83% | +22.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -22.06% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.86% | +19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -22.39% | +17.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 7.25% | -5.54% |
Volatility
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) is 3.60%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that AVWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVWS.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 6.60% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 20.87% | -11.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 23.81% | -9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 21.94% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 18.08% | +0.19% |
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVWS.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVWS.DE vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVWS.DE nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVWS.DE and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
AVWS.DE is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AVWS.DE and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for AVWS.DE and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer