AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L
AVWS.DE (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR) and ITPS.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AVWS.DE is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while ITPS.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. AVWS.DE is actively managed, while ITPS.L is passively managed. Over the past year, AVWS.DE returned 39.51% vs 4.67% for ITPS.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVWS.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ITPS.L.
Performance
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AVWS.DE is traded in EUR, while ITPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ITPS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVWS.DE achieves a 21.62% return, which is significantly higher than ITPS.L's 2.38% return.
AVWS.DE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITPS.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVWS.DE Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR | 21.62% | 7.86% | 5.81% |
ITPS.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.38% | -5.50% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVWS.DE and ITPS.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVWS.DE
ITPS.L
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVWS.DE | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 1.15 | +5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.97 | 2.99 | +20.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum ITPS.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVWS.DE and ITPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVWS.DE | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.20% | -99.50% | +74.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.37% | -3.82% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -98.92% | +98.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -94.19% | +89.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.48% | +0.23% |
Volatility
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L) at 1.07%. This indicates that AVWS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVWS.DE | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 1.07% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 4.33% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 6.15% | +8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 20.79% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.18% | +2.09% |
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVWS.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ITPS.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVWS.DE vs. ITPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVWS.DE nor ITPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVWS.DE and ITPS.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITPS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITPS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.
AVWS.DE is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while ITPS.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AVWS.DE and 0.12% for ITPS.L.
Find the right allocation for AVWS.DE and ITPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer