PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AVWS.DE is traded in EUR, while CPXJ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CPXJ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVWS.DE achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than CPXJ.L's 10.29% return.


AVWS.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.07%
YTD
19.96%
6M
19.61%
1Y
37.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPXJ.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.39%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.95%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.53

The correlation between AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVWS.DE
AVWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CPXJ.L
CPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVWS.DECPXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.88

2.82

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.59

7.90

+14.70

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVWS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum CPXJ.L drawdown of -36.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVWS.DECPXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.20%

-36.85%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

-6.00%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.85%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-6.60%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.15%

-0.50%

Volatility

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE) is 3.33%, while iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that AVWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVWS.DECPXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.62%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

10.30%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

12.89%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

15.66%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.36%

+0.82%

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVWS.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CPXJ.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVWS.DE vs. CPXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVWS.DE nor CPXJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPXJ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.

AVWS.DE is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while CPXJ.L is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AVWS.DE and 0.20% for CPXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVWS.DE and CPXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer