PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AVUV is traded in USD, while ZTIP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZTIP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 22.73% return, which is significantly higher than ZTIP.TO's 1.43% return.


AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.11%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*

ZTIP.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%28.78%
ZTIP.TO
BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF
1.53%5.95%4.95%4.41%-2.24%4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUV and ZTIP.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTIP.TO
ZTIP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVUVZTIP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

2.48

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

7.40

+7.69

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUV and ZTIP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than ZTIP.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and ZTIP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUVZTIP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-6.85%

-42.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-1.75%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.79%

-2.38%

-26.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-6.85%

-21.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.78%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-1.58%

-6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

0.58%

+2.09%

Volatility

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) at 1.06%. This indicates that AVUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTIP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUVZTIP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

1.06%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

3.94%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

5.79%

+11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

7.81%

+14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.26%

7.78%

+20.48%

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTIP.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVUV vs. ZTIP.TO - Dividend Comparison

AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than ZTIP.TO's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
ZTIP.TO
BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF
3.42%3.63%3.63%4.91%4.93%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUV and ZTIP.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZTIP.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZTIP.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ZTIP.TO is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUV and ZTIP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer